A common misconception in employment-based immigration is that only large, well-established corporations can qualify for the L-1A Intracompany Transferee visa or the EB-1C Multinational Executive or Manager green card. In reality, company size alone is not determinative.
Small and growing companies can qualify, provided they are structured in a way that supports a true executive or managerial role as defined under U.S. immigration law.
USCIS does not evaluate eligibility based on how large a company is, but rather on how the organization functions.
The central question in both L-1A and EB-1C cases is:
“Does the company have a structure that allows the beneficiary to operate in an executive or managerial capacity, rather than performing day-to-day operational work?”
A small company can meet this standard. A poorly structured large company may not.
The L-1A category allows multinational companies to transfer executives or managers to a U.S. entity, including new offices.
For smaller businesses, USCIS may allow some flexibility, particularly at the initial stage. However, the petition must still demonstrate:
For new office petitions, USCIS will also assess whether the company can realistically support an executive or managerial role within one year.
EB-1C petitions are generally subject to greater scrutiny than L-1A petitions.
Unlike L-1A, which may consider future growth, EB-1C requires that the U.S. entity already supports a qualifying executive or managerial position at the time of filing.
For smaller companies, this often becomes the key challenge.
USCIS will closely examine:
A lean organization where the beneficiary is involved in daily operations may not meet the EB-1C standard, even if the business is growing.
For smaller companies, function manager classification may be a viable path.
A function manager does not necessarily supervise employees but instead manages an essential function of the organization at a senior level.
However, these cases require careful documentation, including:
Function manager cases are often closely scrutinized and must be clearly structured.
Smaller businesses often face issues such as:
These challenges can often be addressed through careful planning and structured documentation.
Small companies seeking L-1A or EB-1C classification should focus on:
In many cases, timing is critical, particularly when transitioning from L-1A to EB-1C.
Small companies can qualify for L-1A and EB-1C, but approval depends on organizational structure, staffing, and the nature of the beneficiary’s role—not company size.
A well-structured small company may meet the requirements, while a larger but operationally dependent business may not.
If you are considering an L-1A or EB-1C petition for a small or growing company, contact our office for professional drafting and case preparation services tailored to your organizational structure and long-term immigration strategy.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Immigration laws and requirements change frequently. Consult a qualified attorney for advice tailored to your circumstances.Access insight, news and updates from across the Thomas V. Allen
Beginning today, Jan. 22, 2018, USCIS will email notifications of receipt and approval to H-2A (temporary agricultural worker) petitioners who fileForm I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker. Also starting today, USCIS will use pre-paid mailers provided by H-2A petitioners to send requests for evidence (RFE) if issued in a case. These process changes apply only […]
The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, an Obama-era program that protects hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the US as children from deportation. The 5-4 ruling was written by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, […]
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), has announced an increase in premium processing fees pursuant to the USCIS Stabilization Act. The increase reflects a congressionally mandated, inflation based adjustment and is part of a biennial review process designed to ensure that premium processing fees retain their real dollar […]