In recent years, Requests for Evidence (RFEs) in E-2 Treaty Investor petitions have increasingly focused on one critical issue: the lawful source and path of investment funds.
While the E-2 visa remains a flexible and powerful option for entrepreneurs and business owners, USCIS scrutiny has intensified, particularly regarding how investment capital was earned, transferred, and ultimately committed to the U.S. enterprise. Understanding this trend is essential for investors seeking approval without delay.
The E-2 category requires that investment funds be:
USCIS is no longer satisfied with general statements that funds came from “business profits” or “personal savings.” Officers now expect documented, chronological tracing from the original source to the U.S. business account.
In many recent RFEs, adjudicators are requesting:
The review is not merely about whether the investor has funds; it is about whether the government can clearly trace those funds.
Several patterns frequently lead to additional scrutiny:
1. Funds Routed Through Multiple AccountsWhen capital moves between personal, corporate, joint, or family accounts, each transfer must be documented. Gaps in the chain often result in RFEs.
2. Gifts Without Proper Documentation
Gifted funds are permissible, but USCIS requires proof that:
If funds originate from a business sale, officers typically request:
Large cash deposits without a clear accumulation trail often raise concerns about commingling or undocumented income.
Beyond the lawful source, USCIS also examines the path of funds — meaning the precise movement of capital from origin to final investment.
A strong E-2 petition should include:
Missing even one link can result in a request for clarification.
Several factors may explain the uptick in scrutiny:
As adjudications become more document-driven, petitions that once may have been approved with summary explanations now require comprehensive financial tracing.
Preparation is critical. Before filing, investors should:
Clarity reduces officer confusion and minimizes the likelihood of RFEs.
Final Thoughts
The E-2 visa remains an excellent pathway for entrepreneurs and treaty investors. However, approval increasingly depends on presenting a meticulously documented financial narrative. A well-prepared petition does not simply show that the investor has capital. It demonstrates, step by step, how the funds were lawfully earned, accumulated, transferred, and committed to the U.S. business. Given current adjudication trends, detailed tracing is no longer optional, it is essential.
If you are preparing to file an E-2 petition or responding to a source-of-funds RFE, our office can provide a tailored review of your documentation to help ensure your investment is properly structured and clearly traceable under current adjudication standards.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Immigration laws and requirements change frequently. Consult a qualified attorney for advice tailored to your circumstances.
Access insight, news and updates from across the Thomas V. Allen
On February 12, 2018, the Texas Service Center (TSC) will begin processing certain Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker petitions for L nonimmigrant classification, also known as L visas. The TSC will share this workload with the California Service Center to balance workloads and to provide flexibility as USCIS works towards improving processing times […]
USCIS has just announced that they are now extending the suspension of CAP subject H-1B petitions all the way until February 19, 2019.
Employers will get a permanent option for verifying employment eligibility remotely beginning Aug. 1 under new Homeland Security Department regulations. The rule was released Friday ahead of the Aug. 30 expiration of temporary, Covid-19 era flexibility for employment verification. Companies that have used that option for the past three years have scrambled in recent weeks to review […]