USCIS issuing RFE’s on I-765 EAD Applications questioning why USCIS should exercise discretion in approving the application

December 31, 2020
×Close
Many legal practitioners have reported that they are receiving Request for Evidence (RFE's) for the I-765, Application for Employment Authorization filed requesting the applicant to provide favorable factors warranting a grant in the exercise of discretion. The new RFE's have made the I-765 Applications more complex. USCIS recently changes its policy and made the approval of EAD's as a matter of discretion.  The new change was updated in the policy manual. While employment authorization for certain aliens is automatic or non-discretionary by virtue of their immigration status, other aliens must affirmatively apply for employment authorization and USCIS may grant employment authorization as a matter of discretion. The regulations outlined at 8 CFR 274a.12(c) specify categories of aliens who must apply for employment authorization and may be granted employment authorization as a matter of discretion. For those Category C applicants seeking both employment authorization and an employment authorization document (EAD), the applicant must generally file an Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765) with USCIS with the appropriate fee (unless waived), and in accordance with the form instructions. In addition to verifying the applicant’s identity and that the applicant meets all other eligibility criteria, USCIS must determine if a favorable exercise of discretion is warranted in granting employment authorization to a Category C applicant. USCIS determines whether to grant discretionary employment authorization on a case-by-case basis by taking into account all factors and considering the totality of the circumstances. The ultimate decision to grant discretionary employment authorization for a Category C applicant depends on whether, based on the facts and circumstances of the case, USCIS finds that the positive factors outweigh any negative factors that may be present, and that a favorable exercise of discretion is warranted. The denial of employment authorization is not subject to administrative appeal.    
Upcoming Webinars
VIEW ALL

Related News

VIEW ALL
New Executive Order banning the entry of certain non-immigrants delayed as the President’s Cabinet Members and Top advisors could not reach a consensus.

  The Trump administration is weighing a significant expansion of current visa restrictions for foreign workers, widening the scope to include the highly skilled workers relied on by industries ranging from tech to healthcare. Several of President Donald Trump’s cabinet members and top advisers met on Tuesday [06/16/2020]  afternoon to discuss a possible executive order […]

Supreme Court blocks Trump from ending DACA

The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, an Obama-era program that protects hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the US as children from deportation.   The 5-4 ruling was written by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, […]

Success Story: H-4 EAD Litigation

Attorney Mika B. Kozar, filed a lawsuit for a bank employee seeking a D.C. federal court to compel U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to address delays in his visa renewal application, saying the delays put him at risk of losing his job. The complaint said that the USCIS has unreasonably delayed renewing his visa and […]